Tuesday, April 16, 2013

"The BAD Tour 2013" - Brian, Al, and David


Someone on the Smiley Smile Message Board dubbed the Brian/Al/David tour dates as the "BAD Tour", and I certainly believe it will be anything but bad (unless we're talking about the good kind of "bad", but that's a discussion for an old fuddy-duddy parent to have circa 1990).

What remains to be seen at this point is how much of a "tour" this will be. Here's what the schedule looks like so far:

    • July 20 — Atlantic City, NJ (The Grand @ The Golden Nuggett)
    • July 21 — Pittsburgh, PA (Stage AE)
    • July 23 — Interlochen, MI (Kresge Auditorium)
    • July 25 — Kettering, OH (Fraze Pavilion)
    • July 26 — Highland Park, IL (Ravinia Festival Pavilion)
    • July 27 — Apple Valley, MN (Minnesota Zoo, Weesner Family Amphitheater)
    • October 20 — Los Angeles, CA (Greek Theatre)

So we have six dates bunched together in late July, and a random October date in L.A. It might be tempting to believe they will literally fill in the entire time between 7/27 and 10/20 with tour dates, but that seems unlikely. But I certainly hope we get some additional dates, at least something akin to a standard Brian solo tour from the old days, a good 20-30 shows or so that hopefully gets around most of North America.
What can we expect from these shows? I think they could be awesome, especially if they allow David and especially Al to have more than just cameo roles in the show. When Al played a few gigs with Brian in 2006/2007, he was really relegated to a few leads. Beyond that, it was more just the novelty of seeing the two guys together. Let's hope Brian hands over a substantial number of leads to Al, and some to David as well. Let's also hope we see Al and David introducing their own stuff into the setlist. I'd love to see Al sing "Cottonfields" and "California Saga" again, but I wouldn't mind seeing him add "Don't Fight the Sea", or "Lady Lynda", or "Santa Ana Winds", and so on.

We'll be getting essentially/presumably the 50th Anniversary tour lineup minus Love, Johnston, Cowsill, and Totten and probably one additional person to fill in on drums and/or bass (Brett Simons?). So it should be an awesome show, and maybe Brian will be more at east not having to do all the vocal heavy lifting on the tour.

Saturday, April 13, 2013

"50th Anniversary Tour" CD Set Tracklisting.....



It appears we have a track listing for the live album:

Disc 1
1 "Do It Again"
2 "Little Honda"
3 "Catch A Wave"
4 "Hawaii"
5 "Don't Back Down"
6 "Surfin' Safari"
7 "Surfer Girl"
8 "The Little Girl I Once Knew"
9 "Wendy"
10 "Getcha Back"
11 "Then I Kissed Her"
12 "Marcella"
13 "Isn't It Time"
14 "Why Do Fools Fall In Love"
15 "When I Grow Up (To Be A Man)"
16 "Disney Girls"
17 "Be True To Your School"
18 "Little Deuce Coupe"
19 "409"
20 "Shut Down"
21 "I Get Around"

Disc 2
1 "Pet Sounds"
2 "Add Some Music To Your Day"
3 "Heroes And Villains"
4 "Sail On, Sailor"
5 "California Saga: California"
6 "In My Room"
7 "All This Is That"
8 "That's Why God Made The Radio"
9 "Forever"
10 "God Only Knows"
11 "Sloop John B"
12 "Wouldn't It Be Nice"
13 "Good Vibrations"
14 "California Girls"
15 "Help Me, Rhonda"
16 "Rock And Roll Music"
17 "Surfin' U.S.A."
18 "Kokomo"
19 "Barbara Ann"
20 "Fun, Fun, Fun"  

I suppose this is about what I expected. I had little hope that we would get a presenation of all 61 songs peformed on the tour. I held a bit of hope out for this based on the band playing all 61 songs at their second-to-last tour stop at the Royal Albert Hall.

The set is an unsurprising mixture of most of the expected hits, with a handfull of the "rare" tracks thrown in. Brian seems to love "Marcella", so that got in. Both Mike and Al seemed into "All This Is That", so that made it. Al added his signature "California Saga" a month into the tour and everyone seemed to have fun with that, so that made it. David's turns on "Getcha Back" and "Pet Sounds" are nice to see.

So what about the exclusions? Some make more sense than others. Many fans have noted the absence of "Cottonfields", which was one of Al's best peformances during the tour. In fact, a lack of more Al (sorry everybody, he has by LEAPS AND BOUNDS the most in-tact voice of the band)  is the biggest let down, as not only was "Cottonfields" dropped, but also "California Dreamin'" and "Come Go With Me". Don't get me wrong, I've never been that enthused about the band's peformances of "Come Go With Me." They always sound fine, but the song is a cover, and kind of boring at this point. But more Al would have been nice. They frankly should have given him more leads during the tour in general, either letting him add more of his songs or giving him a few leads like "Sloop John B" or even just a few of Mike's leads.

The 20 songs from the tour left off the set are:

This Whole World
Come Go With Me
Good Timin'
It's OK
Still Cruisin'
Our Prayer
I Just Wasn't Made For These Times
California Dreamin
Summer's Gone
Dance Dance Dance
Please Let Me Wonder
Kiss Me Baby
All Summer Long
You're So Good To Me
Do You Wanna Dance
Cottonfields
Don't Worry Baby
Ballad of Ole Betsy
Darlin'
Let Him Run Wild

Some of these objectively make *some* sense, even if I don't have a single objection to any songs. The four at the bottom of the list consist of the leads peformed by non-Beach Boys. Their exclusion is probably not coincidental. Too bad, as they were all good performances. "This Whole World" would have been great, even though I have yet to hear Brian peform a solid lead vocal on this since he started doing it live in 1999. That may be why it was only sporadically peformed during the tour, and left off the set. "Summer's Gone" was only done twice on the last two shows, so that one's not surprising. "Our Prayer" was only done a few times as well. Brian's turn on "I Just Wasn't Made for These Times" is a bit surprising as an exclusion. "Good Timin'" would have been nice, even if again Brian's lead usually was a bit lackluster, especially distressing considering the lead vocal on that song is not particularly taxing. Al's three aforementioned covers are just that, covers, as is Brian's turn on "Do You Wanna Dance." I felt "Do You Wanna Dance" was probably the weakest song choice on the entire tour, so that's not too distressing to me. Mike seems to have a strong affinity for "It's OK" even if no one else in the band may, so I'm kind of surprised he didn't push to get that one on. "Still Cruisin'", "Dance Dance Dance", "All Summer Long", and "You're So Good to Me" were all songs that were never regularly included in the setlist, so those aren't terribly surprising either.

In any event, while we can hope for some magical third "bonus disc" or some form of bonus tracks that give us more of these songs, this is probably it other than whatever we get on this big tour documentary that is allegedly due on DVD/Blu-ray at the end of the year (and for which donations have been solicited for several months; more on that project in a future post!).



Sunday, April 7, 2013

Recent Articles & Interviews Discussing the "50th" Tour and Future Plans......



Mike Love has given at least a pair of interviews that have popped up recently, discussing last year's reunion as well as future plans. By future plans, I mean doing exactly what occured in 2011 and 2010 and so on. Mike and Bruce are back in full swing with their "Beach Boys" tour, and Mike is apparently still facing questions concerning the awkward ending to last year's reunion tour.

http://www.montgomerynews.com/articles/2013/03/26/entertainment/doc5151c0ad005ae357009610.txt
 
 
In this first article from the Montgomery News, Love basically just restates his "the reunion ended because it ended" argument:
 
“I maintain the attitude that there was an agreed-upon amount of shows that we were to do on the anniversary celebration,” he said. “Those shows were accomplished and I think a lot of fans got a lot of pleasure out of it and we had a good time doing it.

“But I’m not opposed to any future involvement. It’s just that those agreed-upon dates came and went and now we’re off to do what we do with our group. Al has his group and Brian has his group.”
 
As already discussed at length by fans, this reasoning explains in the most functional sense why there aren't more reunion shows (e.g. the tour ended because it ended), but doesn't explain at all why Love didn't take an option to continue the reunion. It sounds like he needs to just tell us that he doesn't want to play with the other guys, perhaps for financial reasons, perhaps because of politics in the business organization, etc.
 
Love then dug himself a bit of a hole by semi-incorrectly stating:

“If you’ve looked at Al’s website recently, there’s so much ‘Hate Mike Love’ stuff going on. You would wonder why he’d entertain that stuff on his website,” said Love. “I’d never post anything or allow anybody to say anything bad about anybody on mine. I wish people would understand."
 
This resulted in a swift correction from Love and his camp, pointing out that Al's website had nothing of the sort, and Love was actually referring to Facebook-type stuff, which as we all know houses all sorts of crap from every type of fan in the world. As some fans also pointed out, Love's own internet hubs including Facebook feature negative comments about him.
 
 
An additional article and interview from Lancaster Online sheds a bit more light on Love's true reasons for being hesistant about more reunion shows:

Though he had some reservations, Love says he did enjoy working with Wilson during the tour last year."If it was just Brian, it would be great," he says, "but it's not just Brian. That's all I care to say about that." And, again with some reservations, he says he was happy with the music and the presentation of the Beach Boys' catalog of songs.

"I think there were too many guitarists and too many voices competing for parts for my taste, but it was a good experience musically," he says. "Brian has a good band and there were some good musicians there. We had a good time."

Asked about the possibility of working with Wilson in the future, Love says, "I'm not negative on it but there are no plans at this moment in time to do anything more. But Ian Fleming taught us to 'never say never.'"

The comment concerning Brian seems to indicate the political machine surrounding Brian. While it might be easy to think Mike means Al, or the backing band, one would venture to guess it is Brian's "camp" that Mike is referring to, a camp that Mike's "camp" had to closely worth with (along with Joe Thomas) to make the reunion tour and album happen.

Also interesting is Love's characterization of the touring band, largely made up of Brian's long-time touring band. Love was effusive in his praise for this band when the tour started, and that was bizarre to begin with considering he had spent that last 14 years going out of his way to not discuss Brian's solo success much, and that he was ditching all but two of his touring musicians to let Brian's band lay claim to the "Beach Boys" touring band role. But early in the tour, Love was already making very small references to feeling the band was larger than he preferred.

The reason the new comments from Love are interesting is that they suggest that Love has some musical reason for having misgivings about the band. But you'd be hard pressed to find a fan or commentator that would suggest anything terribly negative about Brian's band. They have been praised by other musicians, stars, and so on. No, I think the evidence suggests it's the admittedly bloated budget that such a contingent of musicians would likely dictate that is at the heart of Love's misgivings. It's also true that a huge band probably isn't needed for some of his "meat and potatoes" numbers. But I find it hard to believe that he didn't hear the fullest arrangements he had ever head playing behind him on the mid 60's material that requires the huge band.

As I haven't posted for quite awhile, a likely unneeded update to the current touring situation can be found by simply perusing the Beach Boys Fan Club tour schedule, which shows that the Mike/Bruce "Beach Boys" band has a typical full year of touring currently being booked. Meanwhile, the Brian/Al/David lineup has a few more dates booked together, so hopefully they can swing by more cities and give us the closest approximation to the 50th tour.


New "50th Anniversary" Live CD Potentially Due

An intriguing listing has popped up on Amazon for a 2-CD set. Check it out: http://www.amazon.com/Live-The-50th-Anniversary-Tour/dp/B00C7O8TSM
 
It appears to be legit, although we'll see if the imminent release date holds. It's a bit odd we haven't heard a peep about this, but it's due in six weeks.
 
On the plus side, 2 CD's should afford the opportunity for at least something more substantial than the 21 tracks we got on the "Live in Concert" DVD/Blu-ray.
 
It's doubtful we'll get all 61 songs performed on the tour, especially as they probably wouldn't fit that on 2 CD's even if they cut every bit of crowd noise and stage banter.
 
But it would be nice to at least get a representation of the typical show on the tour that usually included around 44 to 50 songs each night.
 
 

Saturday, April 6, 2013

Wouldn't It Be Nice to Hear "Wouldn't It Be Nice To Live Again"?



In the world of the Beach Boys, we still occasionally do get a true surprise. Think the "Good Vibrations" sessions film footage that surfaced in the last few years, or those reels from the "Shut Down Vol. 2" sessions that someone randomly produced.

Less dramatic but still interesting is the surfacing, after nearly 7 years, of an in-house reference copy of the "Warmth of the Sun" compilation that features an alternate tracklisting and track order. Sure, it's a bit interesting that they considered weird inclusions like "In the Parkin' Lot", and it's cool to see a representation of the vetting process for tracklistings for projects like this.

But look close, and you'll see one key track, Track #26. Long rumored and now confirmed is that the legendary (and heard by so few) Dennis Wilson "Surf's Up" era track "(Wouldn't It Be Nice To) Live Again" was definitely slated to be included on this CD. But more importantly, the picture above is from eBay auction in which the actual CD in question was sold.

Considering how much unreleased Beach Boys material floats around, it's actually surprising that this track has never been leaked or bootlegged, not even as some sort of murky, muddy bootleg recording. Cover versions of the track have been aired in recent years, and a few fans have heard the actual Beach Boys recording. But there are few tracks in the Beach Boys universe that are so legendary despite having never been heard in any form.

The ultimate question fans currently have is whether this CD and this specific track will "leak" somehow. The CD sold for almost $400 on eBay. I'd say the chances of this leaking are a bit lower than one would normally think. This is the only currently known possible source that the song could leak from, and of course the buyer is traceable through eBay.

If the supposed "Made in California" boxed set does ever surface, this track would surely have to be included if the set is actual intended to showcase unreleased material. So this hoopla may all be over soon enough anyway.

But it would be tantalizing to hear this track, even if I'm not 100% convinced it will blow my mind quite as much as some fans seem to think.


Friday, January 25, 2013

Wilson, Jardine, Marks, Nash, and Young........



Okay, Nash and Young aren't involved.... as far as I know. But this hilariously doctored version of the back cover of the Beach Boys' "That's Why God Made the Radio" album does signal that the Brian/Al/David lineup appears to be enough of a future going concern that they're publicizing it on Brian's internet hubs (Facebook, etc.).

Fans were of course quick to spot that the photo is, well, photoshopped. Some fans have been quick to wag their finger in shame as the strange exaggerated defense of Mike Love continues. Somehow, this doctored photo is as heinous to some fans as Mike nixing more reunion shows and continuing to use the "Beach Boys" name.

In any event, it continues to be an open question as to whether this is just three buddies joining together for some shows, or some sort of salvo in a passive-agressive post-reunion Beach Boys era.

Someone over on the Smiley Smile board posted some hilarious and (hopefully) bogus "Breaking News":


Thursday, January 24, 2013

The State of the Beach Boys in 2013......

 


The theoretical debates of the reunion tour's aftermath are now beginning to become less theoretical, as the group's 2013 plans are beginning to come into focus even if the actual members are staying relatively silent.

So what do we know about plans for 2013 so far? The long-awaited "career-spanning boxed set" is apparently being prepped. That project, if done well, could end up being the most exciting event of the year. Let's hope it's light on the hits that we own a hundred copies of and heavy on rarities and unreleased tracks.

As far as tour plans, while nobody has yet come out and specifically said "no reunion shows in 2013", the writing appears to be on the wall as it pretty much was before the reunion tour was even over. The Love/Johnston contingent now has more than just a handfull of shows booked for 2013. If there had ever been a chance of somehow weaving reunion shows into that fold, that chance would seem nill in light of how disastrous it was when the reunion tour butted up against Love's "Beach Boys" tour last year, literally to the point of finishing the reunion tour and heading out the next day for a "non-reunion" Beach Boys show featuring only Love and Johnston.

If there ever is another "reunion" show or tour, I would imagine they will space the two tours out much more (which, I'm well aware, was the original plan with the 2012 tour as well; although I would argue even giving it a month or two as was the original plan was probably not enough spacing).

Meanwhile, the plans of the other three Beach Boys, who don't feel compelled to peform 100+ shows per year, are not quite as apparent. But we may well have a glimpse of what is in store. Brian did a couple of solo gigs in late 2012, capping the year off with a very short set peformed in L.A. with Al Jardine in tow.

Just days ago, word got out of a solo Brian Wilson show in Ohio, billed as "Brian Wilson with Special Guests Al Jardine and David Marks." So what could this mean? At this point, it's literally one show. It will be interesting to see if Brian is going to do an actual "tour" this year, meaning at least a dozen or two shows strung together. If he does tour, will Al and David be in on all of the shows?

The less functional and more gossipy question is, what does Brian touring with Al and David mean in light of the full "reunited" group's dynamic, not to mention the corporate setup concerning Mike's license to use the Beach Boys name? Is Brian's camp making some sort of passive-agressive move here? Is there any implication that Brian and Al will move to vote to strip Mike of the license to use the Beach Boys name? Are Brian and Al simply trying to send a little shot across to Mike to motivate him to get back to the reunion lineup? Perhaps it's as simple as Brian, Al, and David wanting to continue to perform (as they did with the reunion last year), and then simply deciding to tour together in the fullest possible contingent.

Even if Brian touring with Al and David is not meant as any sort of message or shot across to Mike, it's hard to argue against the idea that putting together a three-member Beach Boys contingent touring under their own names while a two-member contingent uses the name "The Beach Boys" is something that will not make Mike look good in the media. We may be able to count the days until some media outlet points out that there are two Beach Boys in "The Beach Boys" while there are three Beach Boys in a different band. One of the few things in PR terms that Mike has had going for him in past years using the Beach Boys name is that no other touring contingent was able to scrape together more Beach Boys (or even two Beach Boys, aside from a few Brian/Al shows in 2006/2007) to compete. With Carl gone, Brian disinterested, and only Al in the way (who at various times may or may not have wanted to even peform with Love), Mike could throughout the 2000's contend that he was presenting the only version of "The Beach Boys" that was available and willing to perform together.

This no longer appears to be the case. Brian, Al, and David all by everybody's admission were ready and willing to do more reunion shows in 2012 and/or beyond. Even as the members split back up into multiple parties, Mike is now faced with at least the possibility of another indirect (and perhaps unintentional) competitor in the form of three more Beach Boys performing together. Realistically, this doesn't mean much. As with the ruckus of late 2012, Mike may see a bit of negative PR. But as long as he uses the "Beach Boys" name, no other Beach Boys-related band will pose any threat in terms of Mike's ability to book shows and generate income.

The only thing that would have more broad implications is the prospect of Brian and Al moving towards voting to change the licensing setup for use of the band's name. Some fans have continued to point out that Brian and Al may want to continue on with the full reunion lineup, but their inaction in doing anything about the licensing arrangements havs shown no strong desire to keep Mike from using the name. In terms of the future, this may or may not be true. It's too soon to tell. We just don't know enough about the machinations of the inner-workings of BRI or enough details of the licensing agreement. Brian and Al may want to act, but are unable to do so until a specific point in time. They may not want to act, and are touring in at least symbolic competition to Mike's "Beach Boys" to imply that they could move in that direction. Or, as I've said, things may be a bit awkward or strained but still friendly, and Brian, Al, and David may just be touring together because they want to or because it sounds like a good idea. Perhaps the full reunited lineup will record in the studio at some point this year, and perhaps they'll work up more joint live shows at some point.

The idea of a permanently reunited Beach Boys was dead before the idea was brought up, and was certainly dead as soon as Mike started booking his own "Beach Boys" shows in 2012. Given the current setup, it appears the best we can hope for is that the full band will still be able to co-exist with seperate touring groups. When bands break off and do solo stuff, this is often quite easy to pull off. The problem the Beach Boys are having is that one of the members wants to continue to break off but continue to use the band's name. If they can somehow resolve this issue to everyone's relative satisfaction, my small shred of hopefullness still leads me to believe we may be able to see a scenario play out where Mike and Bruce tour in 2013 as "The Beach Boys" while Brian, Al, and David tour with their setup, while all five simultaneously record in 2013 during downtime from touring, and then perhaps they can put a new album out in 2014 and maybe even tour behind it again as a reunited five-piece group.